ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Case Report: Atypical pattern of pathologic response in cutaneous transdifferentiated melanoma with rhabdomyoblastic differentiation following neoadjuvant therapy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transdifferentiated melanoma is a rare variant of melanoma characterized by phenotypic plasticity, loss of conventional melanocytic markers, and acquisition of features from other tissue lineages, often associated with aggressive biological behavior. Among these, melanoma with rhabdomyosarcomatous differentiation represents an exceptionally rare presentation that poses significant diagnostic and clinical challenges, particularly in the context of immunotherapy. We report the case of a 38-year-old male with a remote history of cutaneous melanoma who presented with an isolated left axillary nodal recurrence. Histopathological examination revealed a biphasic melanoma with a dedifferentiated component showing focal rhabdomyosarcomatous differentiation. The patient was treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy using ipilimumab and nivolumab. Treatment was discontinued after two cycles due to immune-related hepatitis and aseptic meningitis requiring immunosuppressive therapy. Post-treatment imaging demonstrated a mixed metabolic response. Subsequent axillary lymphadenectomy revealed a complete pathological response of the melanocytic component, while a high-grade sarcomatoid/rhabdomyoblastic component remained viable, exhibiting high proliferative activity and loss of melanocytic markers. Molecular profiling identified NRAS Q61R and TERT promoter mutations, equivocal MYC amplification, and an elevated tumor mutational burden. The patient received adjuvant radiotherapy and remains under close oncologic surveillance. This case illustrates an atypical pattern of pathological response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy, characterized by eradication of the differentiated melanocytic component and persistence of a dedifferentiated, rhabdomyoblastic tumor population. These findings suggest phenotypic plasticity and immune escape as potential mechanisms of resistance, underscoring the need for integrated histopathological and molecular assessment when evaluating pathological response in rare melanoma variants. As neoadjuvant immunotherapy becomes increasingly incorporated into clinical practice, it is crucial to characterize its impact across the diverse presentations of melanoma and to understand the distinct patterns of pathological response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.