ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
Flow cytometry enables rapid evaluation of novel, new and niche antimicrobial agents.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global rise of multidrug-resistant bacteria necessitates the development of new antimicrobials and faster diagnostic tools. Conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing is slow, relying on culture-based methods that delay effective treatment, often with fatal consequences in severe infections. In this study, we evaluate flow cytometry as a rapid, culture-minimal method to assess bacterial responses to six antimicrobials: ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, cefiderocol, doxycycline, omadacycline, and lefamulin. Across 165 evaluable antibiotic-isolate combinations, essential agreement between flow cytometry and broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations was 90.71%. Assessable categorical agreement, determined using the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints, was 92.59% for doxycycline, 91.67% for omadacycline, and 100% for meropenem-vaborbactam. Cefiderocol exposure was associated with substantial cell elongation, demonstrating cellular-level antimicrobial effects observed using confocal microscopy and imaging flow cytometry. These findings demonstrate the potential of flow cytometry for novel antimicrobial evaluation, offering rapid insights into drug efficacy with potential to improve clinical outcomes in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.