ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Differentiating Spotted Fever From Scrub Typhus Based on Clinical and Laboratory Features: A Retrospective Cohort Study From South India.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Scrub typhus and spotted fever are the two most common rickettsial infections in India. Both conditions differ, however, in terms of epidemiological risk, clinical presentation, and prognosis. We aimed to compare the clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients diagnosed with scrub typhus or spotted fever to identify disease indicators that are useful in low-resource endemic settings. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among adults admitted with undifferentiated fever lasting 5-15 days at a tertiary care hospital in coastal Karnataka, India, between January 2017 and December 2023. Probable spotted fever and probable scrub typhus were diagnosed by single positive serology, using the Weil-Felix test and IgM ELISA, respectively. Patients with coinfection between the two study conditions or with any other confirmed pathogen were excluded from the analysis. Binary logistic regression was performed with spotted fever as the dependent variable and scrub typhus as the referent category. Results: Of 1045 patients with undifferentiated fever, 94 met the study criteria for probable spotted fever and 643 for probable scrub typhus. Probable spotted fever was observed throughout the year, whereas probable scrub typhus showed a marked monsoon and post-monsoon predominance, from June to November. Rash (39.4% vs 11.0%, Conclusions: Probable scrub typhus and probable spotted fever can be differentiated by a set of epidemiological, clinical, and first-line laboratory variables. These findings should improve the bedside diagnostic approach while awaiting further multicenter prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.