Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42158347›Full record

ArticlePublic health action2026

A hybrid intensive care unit in a resource-constrained cancer hospital in northeast India.

A Kesha, R S Tayshetye, P Mukherjee, H D Shewade, M Das, M B Lokesh, S G S Kumar, D Raman, R Kannan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A KeshaCachar Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (CCHRC), Silchar, India.
R S TayshetyeCachar Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (CCHRC), Silchar, India.
P MukherjeeCachar Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (CCHRC), Silchar, India.
H D ShewadeICMR National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE), Chennai, India.
M DasFIND, Delhi, India.
M B LokeshCloudphysician Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India.
S G S KumarCloudphysician Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India.
D RamanCloudphysician Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India.
R KannanCachar Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (CCHRC), Silchar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compensate for the non-availability of intensive care specialists, Cachar Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (a tertiary hospital in a resource-constrained setting, northeast India) introduced a hybrid intensive care unit (ICU with a centralised monitoring model).

methodsThis was a cohort study involving secondary data for patients admitted with curative intent in the hybrid ICU (October 2021 to December 2022). We report on our early implementation experience in the form of patient management and outcome indicators.

resultsThere were 909 admissions with curative intent, of which 73% were post-surgical. There were 238 admissions from October 2021 to March 2022, which increased to 671 from April to December 2022 (the period when effective implementation happened). The changes (unadjusted

conclusionDespite an increase in admissions following the introduction of the hybrid ICU, it did not adversely impact management and outcome indicators. Post-ICU hospital care, patient caregiver education, and home care team engagement should be strengthened to decrease readmissions.

Indexed as

digital healthICUmalignancyremote monitoringSORT ITtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID42158347
PMCPMC13182884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.