ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology2026
Biomechanical superiority of partial-thickness tendon split and bridging repair after BPTB graft harvest for ACL reconstruction.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft leaves a central tendon defect, and whether this should be repaired remains debated. Conventional suturing techniques often show limited biomechanical benefit. This study evaluated the biomechanical efficacy of a novel Partial-Thickness Split and Bridging Repair (PTSBR) technique compared with non-repair in a cadaveric model. Methods: Twelve knees from six fresh-frozen human cadavers were randomized to repair or non-repair groups. In the repair group, PTSBR involved a longitudinal partial-thickness incision with superficial tendon bridging and interrupted vertical mattress sutures. All specimens were mounted and tested using an Instron universal testing machine. Primary outcomes included maximal load, maximal stress, stiffness, Young's modulus, tendon dimensions, and failure location. Statistical comparisons were performed using paired analyses with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: PTSBR demonstrated significantly higher Young's modulus [90.19 MPa (24.02-202.47) vs. 50.83 MPa (19.96-115.29), p = 0.028] and maximal stress [19.35 MPa (5.21-35.54) vs. 13.30 MPa (5.21-24.23), p = 0.046] compared with non-repair. No difference was observed in maximal load (p = 0.674) or stiffness. Tendon thickness was significantly reduced in the repair group (2.34 ± 0.20 mm vs. 2.69 ± 0.32 mm, p = 0.023). Failure occurred mainly at the tibial or patellar attachment, with no mid-substance ruptures. Conclusion: The PTSBR technique enhanced tensile stiffness and stress resistance compared with non-repair, likely due to improved tendon fiber alignment and load-sharing. These biomechanical advantages suggest that PTSBR may represent a clinically relevant advancement in managing patellar tendon defects after BPTB graft harvest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.