ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Sex as a biological variable in amblyopia: implications for developmental plasticity and treatment.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amblyopia is a common childhood visual disorder caused by abnormal visual experience that drives visual cortical plasticity during the sensitive period. The timing and forms of treatment with patching therapy and other therapeutic interventions have been extensively studied; however, sex has not been a primary focus in studies examining amblyopia. This mini-review synthesizes evidence for sex differences across levels of analysis, from typical visual development to animal models of amblyopia and human studies of amblyopia incidence and treatment. In addition, it highlights latent sex differences in plasticity mechanisms that may provide insights for future visual neuroscience studies of amblyopia. These findings highlight a key concept: visual outcomes may appear similar yet depend on different mechanisms in females and males, potentially influencing the durability of recovery. We discuss a framework to advance a sex-aware research pipeline for amblyopia, spanning basic, preclinical, and clinical/translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.