ArticleNeurology. Genetics2026
Clinical Clues to the Diagnostic Yield of Genetic Testing in Adults With Late-Onset Behavioral Change.
Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnosis of Frontotemporal Dementia in Individuals With Late-Onset Behavioral Changes: Importance of Genetic Counseling.Neurology. Genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia is often difficult because behavioral change has a broad differential diagnosis. Genetic testing may aid in the diagnostic process. We investigated the prevalence of pathogenic genetic variants (PGVs) in individuals referred to our memory clinic with late-onset behavioral change and identified clinical "red flags" for PGV carriership, specifically in diagnostically ambiguous cases. Methods: Individuals presenting with late-onset behavioral change were included from the Late Onset Frontal Lobe Syndrome study (n = 88), Social Brain Project (n = 265), and Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (n = 349). PGV prevalence was calculated. Among diagnostically ambiguous individuals at baseline, univariate logistic regression models were fitted to identify clinical cues for PGV carriership. Based on these results, we fitted multivariate logistic regression models. We also assessed the association of cortical thickness and subcortical volumes with PGV carriership. Results: Among 702 individuals, 228 received a diagnosis in the frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) spectrum at baseline and 474 were diagnostically ambiguous. A total of 106 individuals (15%) carried a PGV (20% in FTLD; 13% in ambiguous cases). The most common PGV in both groups was the Discussion: Genetic testing for dementia-associated genes should be considered in all late-onset behavioral change cases. While we propose several clinical cues as "red flags" for PGV carriership, their absence should not preclude genetic counseling. The higher PGV prevalence among diagnostically ambiguous women suggests that FTLD may be underrecognized in women compared with men.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.