ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Who sends the message matters: social media messengers and adolescent eating.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescents encounter large volumes of non-core (i.e., nutritionally poor and unhealthy) food messages on social media. The relationship between these messages and eating is a product of both the volume of exposure to the message (e.g., frequent exposure) and the various sources (i.e., messengers) relaying each of these messages. This study investigates and compares how adolescents' perceived volume of exposure to food messages from different social media messenger categories (peers, influencers, celebrities, food brands, and health organizations) is associated with their eating outcomes. A cross-sectional survey of 1,002 adolescents (aged 11-19 years) showed that adolescents report significantly higher exposure to non-core food messages posted by peers, celebrities, influencers, and brands compared to core food messages, and that greater exposure to such messages is significantly associated with higher non-core food liking, norms and/or intake. Only exposure to core food messages posted by health organizations was significantly associated with core food consumption. These findings highlight the importance of food marketing regulations particularly those addressing peer and influencer driven content. They also highlight the significance of peers and health organizations, as messenger categories, in social media food communication to adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.