ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Association between meat consumption and cancer mortality in Korean adults.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence regarding the association between meat consumption and cancer mortality remains inconsistent. Most previous studies have focused on total or red meat intake and cancer incidence, with limited data on cancer-specific mortality in Asian populations. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the associations between the consumption of various meat types and site-specific cancer mortality among Korean adults. Methods: We analyzed data from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES), a large population-based cohort in South Korea. Meat intake was assessed using validated food frequency questionnaires and categorized into total meat and specific subtypes. Cancer-specific mortality was ascertained through national death registry linkage. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for major demographic, lifestyle, and dietary factors, with sex-specific and stratified analyses. Results: Total meat consumption was not significantly associated with overall cancer mortality in either men or women. However, sex-specific associations were observed according to meat subtype. Among men, higher red meat consumption was inversely associated with gastric cancer mortality. Among women, higher organ meat consumption was associated with increased pancreatic and breast cancer mortality, with stronger associations observed among women with lower body mass index, older age, and never-smoking status. Conclusion: In this study, total meat intake was not associated with overall cancer mortality, whereas cancer-specific associations differed by meat subtype and sex. These findings suggest that detailed characterization of meat consumption may be important for understanding cancer mortality patterns in Asian populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.