Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42158208›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Courtship choreography is stabilized among genetically isolated populations.

Nathan J Butterworth, Thomas E White, Blake M Dawson, Jesse Appleton, Clayton McDonald, Angela McGaughran, Gregory Markowsky, Keith M Bayless

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Courtship choreography is stabilized among genetically isolated populations.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathan J ButterworthSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5679-2700
Thomas E WhiteSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3976-1734
Blake M DawsonDepartment of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Jesse AppletonSchool of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia.
Clayton McDonaldSchool of Mathematics, Monash University, Wellington Rd, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Angela McGaughranTe Aka Mātuatua, School of Science, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Gregory MarkowskySchool of Mathematics, Monash University, Wellington Rd, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Keith M BaylessAustralian National Insect Collection, CSIRO National Research Collections Australia, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual selection has sculpted diverse and intricate courtship displays throughout the animal kingdom, where failure to achieve the choreographic standards of a potential partner can be highly costly for reproductive success. Yet this raises a paradox: if there is strong selection for optimal display choreography within species, how do courtship displays begin to diverge? To address this, we measure how the choreography of courtship changes among three populations of the dancing dune fly-

Indexed as

behavioral diversificationcourtship behaviorcourtship evolutiondipteragenetic divergencegenetic isolationgeographic divergencesexual selection

Identifiers

PMID42158208
PMCPMC13180646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.