ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Aging in place: implementation facilitators, barriers, and strategies in population health-oriented active aging centers in Singapore.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As populations age rapidly, community-based care is crucial to support aging-in-place. Yet, few models successfully integrate health promotion, social engagement and care coordination at scale. Singapore's Active Aging Centers (AACs) represent a novel, nationally coordinated and funded model that integrates health promotion, social engagement, and care coordination for older adults. Despite the increasing policy importance, little is known how such models are implemented and sustained in practice. Objective: This study examined the facilitators and barriers of implementation of AACs from the perspective of frontline staff. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Semi-structured interviews were performed with 21 center managers and staff in Singapore. Participants were purposively sampled to reflect diversity in operating models and local demographics. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive-deductive approach, and themes were mapped to CFIR domains. Results: Participants viewed the AAC model as conceptually strong and well-aligned with aging-in-place goals. Key facilitators included holistic policy design and community partnerships. Barriers included resource constraints, difficulty engaging underrepresented senior groups and a top-down approach in implementation. Findings also highlight implementation dilemmas of control against frontline flexibility. Novel strategies such as the thematic approach, senior volunteers, and culturally-tailored outreach were adopted to improve engagement and sustainability. Conclusion: Singapore's AAC model demonstrates promise as a population health-oriented, community-based aging intervention. Effective implementation requires flexibility in policy and closer alignment between frontline experiences and central governance. These insights can guide policymakers and aging-in-place systems globally and across the region aiming to build resilient, integrated community care ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.