ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Prevalence and patterns of workplace violence against doctors of North India: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Workplace violence (WPV) against physicians represents an escalating global concern, with significant implications for India. This phenomenon substantially undermines the mental health, professional morale, and clinical performance of healthcare providers. A comprehensive understanding of the prevalence, patterns, and contextual factors associated with WPV is essential to develop evidence-based prevention and mitigation strategies. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 200 physicians (100 employed at a tertiary care teaching hospital and 100 in private healthcare settings) in Dehradun, Uttarakhand, North India. Data were collected using a pretested, self-administered questionnaire assessing experiences of workplace violence, contributing factors, physicians' perceptions, and recommended preventive measures. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23. Results: Workplace violence was reported by 75% of the respondents (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.9-81.0%), with verbal abuse representing the most prevalent form (59.33%; 95% CI: 51.4-67.1%). Violence occurred more frequently among male physicians, particularly in private healthcare settings and surgical specialties. A majority of incidents occurred during junior residency and were perpetrated by patients' relatives (68%) or organized groups (mobs). Notably, only 18% of cases were formally reported by police authorities. Conclusion: Workplace violence was highly prevalent among physicians in Uttarakhand, with verbal abuse and mob-related incidents constituting the predominant manifestations. Urgent interventions, including enhanced security measures, structured physician-patient communication programs, and stringent legal enforcement, are necessary to establish a safer and more supportive working environment for healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.