ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
A framework for culturally adapting mental mHealth apps.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing foundational models in digital health technology adoption: A systematic literature review of multidisciplinary factors.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mobile health (mHealth) apps are increasingly deployed for evidence-based mental health interventions, broadening access to care. While effective, Internet-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, delivered via web or app, frequently overlooks ethnic minority and migrant populations. Effective cultural adaptation of mHealth apps is critical to their impact and accessibility; however, existing frameworks often lack specific guidance for digital contexts, relying on superficial adjustments or omitting the explicit integration of religious factors. Our novel framework fundamentally departs from prior models by embedding cultural responsiveness throughout the entire digital development lifecycle of mHealth apps, rather than treating it as a peripheral concern. This comprehensive approach is structured across four interconnected layers: adapting the therapeutic foundation (explicitly incorporating religious considerations), culturally grounding features and reframing standard tools, tailoring content and messaging, and optimizing UX/UI design. Central to this framework is a participatory co-design and prototyping methodology that ensures deep cultural insights, including religious and spiritual dimensions, are profoundly integrated from the earliest stages of development. This framework thus offers a practical, inclusive, and ethical blueprint for designing culturally relevant digital health products and can be applied and tested in future work through iterative co-design workshops, user-centred prototyping, and the development of culturally tailored digital interventions, with ongoing evaluation of their effectiveness and acceptability in diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.