ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Barriers and facilitators to implementing an integrated electronic health records system to improve tuberculosis preventive treatment among people living with HIV: a content analysis study from Georgia.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Using interpretable decision trees to explore TB-HIV integration under data constraints: a proof-of-concept analysis.Frontiers in tuberculosis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The integration of tuberculosis (TB) preventive treatment (TPT) into HIV services through electronic health records (EHR) can improve outcomes by enhancing care coordination, reducing redundancies, and supporting data-driven decision-making. In Georgia, despite close collaboration between TB and HIV programs, service delivery and data systems remain siloed, forcing patients to navigate between facilities and limiting the effectiveness of TPT among people living with HIV (PWH). Methods: We conducted a qualitative study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Semi-structured interviews with 20 healthcare workers of diverse backgrounds were analyzed using deductive content analysis, structured around the five CFIR domains. The study explored the barriers and facilitators to implementing an integrated EHR system for TB and HIV programs in Georgia, with a focus on improving TPT delivery. Findings aim to inform strategies to enhance digital infrastructure and reduce TB burden among PWH. Results: Participants identified several facilitators, including the perceived advantage of integrated EHR for care continuity among PWH, enhanced patient monitoring, and alignment with international donor priorities. Key barriers included concerns over confidentiality and HIV-related stigma, legal constraints, limited financial and human resources, and insufficient infrastructure such as outdated equipment and unreliable connectivity. Workforce-related challenges, including digital literacy gaps among older clinicians and increased workload during system transition, were also noted. Respondents emphasized the need for phased implementation, stakeholder engagement, and tailored training to support adoption and long-term sustainability. Conclusions: Strong support exists for the implementation of an integrated EHR to improve TPT among PWH in Georgia, but significant barriers must be addressed, including confidentiality, financing, governance, and training needs. Integrating TPT into HIV services, with an EHR module designed to support patient-centered pathways, could reduce many of these challenges. A phased, context-specific approach, supported by continuous feedback mechanisms, will be critical for sustainable EHR implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.