Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42158169›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hepatology2026

Comparison of Postoperative MELD-Based Scores in Predicting Mortality After Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Akira Katayama, Ezeldeen Abuelkasem, David W Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Akira KatayamaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, pitt.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5581-4605
Ezeldeen AbuelkasemDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, pitt.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0147-2320
David W WangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, pitt.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2553-1081

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative prognostic assessment is critical for patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores calculated in the early postoperative period have been shown to be associated with postoperative outcomes. While MELD-Na and MELD 3.0 were developed to improve mortality prediction in pretransplant settings by incorporating serum sodium, albumin, and sex, their comparative utility in the postoperative period remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study including adult LT recipients between January 2012 and June 2023. MELD, MELD-Na, and MELD 3.0 scores were calculated on Postoperative Day (POD) 7. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Predictive performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Subgroup analyses were performed according to serum sodium, albumin levels, and sex. Results: A total of 1038 patients were included. All three MELD-based scores calculated on POD 7 were associated with 30-day mortality (MELD original, hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% CI 1.13-1.27, Conclusion: MELD, MELD-Na, and MELD 3.0 scores calculated on POD 7 showed comparable performance in predicting 30-day mortality after LT. These findings support the use of POD 7 MELD-based scores for postoperative risk stratification, with no meaningful difference in predictive performance among the three scoring systems.

Indexed as

liver transplantationModel for End-Stage Liver Diseasemortalityrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID42158169
PMCPMC13182262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.