ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Cybersecurity in Healthcare: Ensuring Patient Safety and Data Privacy.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing data protections for implantable brain-computer interfaces.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Data-Driven Efficiency Benchmarking for Risk Mitigation: A Data Envelopment Analysis of U.S. Hospitals, 2018-2024.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Healthcare data breaches have increased in both frequency and severity, yet limited empirical evidence exists on the factors associated with large-scale breach events. To address this gap, this study analyzed breaches reported to the US Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights between 2010 and 2025 to determine predictors of large breaches. Methods: A total of 7327 breach reports from the Office for Civil Rights were analyzed. Logistic regression assessed predictors of high‑severity incidents (≥ 100,000 individuals affected). Differences in breach size between incident types were assessed using Wilcoxon rank‑sum tests. Negative binomial regression modelled factors associated with breach magnitude and temporal trends in Hacking/IT classifications over time, adjusting for covariates. Results: Breach sizes were highly right-skewed; the median breach affected 3892 individuals (IQR: 1255-19,471), and roughly 10% of the incidents accounted for the majority of individuals affected. Hacking/IT events were associated with severe breaches (OR = 2.6) and increased from 4% in 2010 to 80% in 2025. Network server incidents resulted in significantly larger breaches than device theft events. Business associate involvement was independently associated with a larger breach magnitude (IRR = 2.0). Conclusion: Hacking/IT mechanisms, network server involvement, and business associate participation were the strongest factors associated with breach severity and magnitude. These findings highlight persistent vulnerabilities in healthcare organizations and reinforce the need for targeted cybersecurity strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.