ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
m6A RNA methylation in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: direct cardiac mechanisms, emerging therapeutic targets, and translational gaps.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SICM) develops in up to 60% of patients with sepsis, substantially increases mortality, and currently lacks specific pharmacotherapy. N6-methyladenosine (m6A), the most prevalent internal modification on eukaryotic mRNA, dynamically regulates transcript fate through coordinated actions of methyltransferases (writers), demethylases (erasers), and binding proteins (readers). Direct cardiac studies have now implicated multiple m6A regulators in several key cellular processes relevant to SICM, including inflammatory injury, apoptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, and adaptive mitophagy. Current evidence highlights pronounced context dependence: the eraser FTO shows the most consistent cardioprotective profile across inflammation, ferroptosis, and mitophagy, whereas the other eraser ALKBH5 paradoxically promotes pyroptotic injury, and the writer METTL3 predominantly drives damage through distinct transcript-reader axes. Notably, several independent m6A pathways converge on the SLC7A11/GPX4/NRF2 antioxidant network, suggesting that ferroptosis-centered m6A regulation may represent the most coherent translational entry point identified thus far. This review synthesizes the direct cardiac evidence using a process-oriented framework, distinguishes injury-associated pathways from adaptive mitochondrial quality control, and identifies critical translational gaps-including heavy reliance on lipopolysaccharide-based models, limited use of primary cardiomyocytes and cardiac-specific genetic tools, and the absence of human validation-that must be addressed before m6A-targeted strategies can advance toward clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.