ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
N-acetylcysteine: evidence based consensus document on the therapeutic advantages in respiratory diseases (NECTAR).
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a key precursor of glutathione (GSH), the lung's principal antioxidant. First developed as a mucolytic, NAC is now recognized for broader antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and anti-biofilm effects, prompting its use as an adjuvant in treatment of chronic respiratory conditions. This document consolidates existing evidence to this effect, and adds insights from practicing clinicians to guide about use of NAC in clinical practice. Methods: An expert working group (EWG) comprising ten pulmonologists and a multidisciplinary drafting committee reviewed data from Results: Experts agreed that NAC is useful as an adjunct in COPD especially chronic bronchitis phenotypes mainly for preventing exacerbations at 600 mg twice daily. During AECOPD, low dose NAC may aid recovery. In TB and AT-DILI, NAC is safe, lowers oxidative stress and may limit lung damage. In non-CF bronchiectasis, NAC may reduce exacerbations in frequent exacerbators. In CF, NAC improves lung function, mucociliary clearance, and disrupts biofilms. NAC is useful in bacterial and viral infections but data for ILDs and asthma does not support routine use. NAC was consistently rated safe and well-tolerated. Conclusion: This consensus underscores the role of NAC in chronic respiratory diseases beyond its mucolytic properties and reiterates that NAC's antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and anti-biofilm properties provide significant clinical utility. It is a proven adjunctive therapy for COPD, bronchiectasis, and cystic fibrosis. While promising for TB and respiratory infections, further evidence is required. Its efficacy in asthma and ILDs remains uncertain. These findings guide clinical practice while highlighting research priorities to fully establish NAC's therapeutic potential in respiratory medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.