SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
The impact of sedation depth on the occurrence of delirium and prognosis in intensive care unit patients: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incidence of delirium in hospitalized heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Delirium and poor clinical prognoses are prevalent among ICU patients, particularly those requiring mechanical ventilation. While sedation is a cornerstone of intensive care, the impact of its depth remains controversial; deep sedation is often linked to adverse outcomes, whereas light sedation may improve recovery trajectories. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the association between sedation depth and delirium incidence, mortality, and ICU length of stay (LOS). Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and PROSPERO registration (CRD420251054377), we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies published through June 17, 2025. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment using RoB 2 for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) or ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies. Evidence quality was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Results: Eleven studies (6 RCTs, 5 cohorts) involving 3,466 patients were included. Meta-analysis using a fixed-effects model demonstrated that deep sedation was significantly associated with a higher incidence of delirium (OR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.15-1.57; Conclusion: Deep sedation is significantly associated with an increased risk of delirium, higher mortality, and extended ICU stays. While these associations are consistent across study designs, clinicians should account for the multifactorial influences on these outcomes. Implementing sedation protocols that prioritize lighter sedation depth may be associated with improved ICU patient prognoses. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251054377, identifier CRD420251054377.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.