Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42158099›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in allergy2026

Real-world retrospective study on allergy screening and its effect on specialist referral patterns.

Inês Costa Farinha, Milagros Lázaro-Sastre, Rosita Castillo Loja, Adelaida Cabrera, Nerea Otero-Fernández, Elena Laffond Yges, Sonia Arriba-Méndez, Ignacio Dávila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Inês Costa FarinhaAllergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Local Health Unit of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Milagros Lázaro-SastreAllergy Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Rosita Castillo LojaAllergy Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Adelaida CabreraAllergy Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Nerea Otero-FernándezAllergy Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Elena Laffond YgesAllergy Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Sonia Arriba-MéndezAllergy Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Ignacio DávilaAllergy Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives: Accurate diagnosis of IgE-mediated diseases requires identifying relevant allergens to guide appropriate clinical management and reduce healthcare costs (1). The ImmunoCAP Phadiatop (Thermo Fisher Scientific) is an Materials and Methods: A real-world retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital allergy department (June 2021-June 2023). Data were collected using the Modulab Laboratory Information System (Werfen, Spain) and stored in a dissociated database. The Ethics Committee of Salamanca approved the study protocol. Phadiatop values above 0.35 PAU/l were considered positive. In case of repeated samples, the first was selected. Variables analyzed included test results, patient demographics, requesting departments, and allergy referrals, a well-balanced mixture of common inhalant allergens with regional adaptation. The allergen groups included were comprise: house dust mites, (e.g., Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, D. farinae), pollens, from grasses (e.g., timothy, ryegrass), trees (e.g., birch, olive), and weeds (e.g., mugwort, plantain, ragweed), molds (e.g., Alternaria, Cladosporium, Aspergillus, Penicillium), and animal dander (e.g., cat, dog). Results: The study included 596 patients (median age 46, 64.1% female). Of these, 12.6% were under 18 years old. Most patients (95.8%) were referred from primary care, with 83.1% of them from urban areas. A total of 37.9% of patients had a positive result (median IgE 7.81 PAU/l). Most positive patients resided in urban areas (82.3%), were aged <18 years of age ( Conclusions: Phadiatop was mainly utilized in primary care. One-third of patients tested positive; of those, only one-third were referred to allergists, with higher Phadiatop values increasing associated with higher referral rates. Positivity was higher in males and younger people.

Indexed as

allergy referralPhadiatop testreal-worldscreening testspecific igE

Identifiers

PMID42158099
PMCPMC13180721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.