ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2026
Removal of spinopelvic S2 alar-iliac osseointegrative screws: a case report and surgical technique guide.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traditional S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws have an increased risk of screw loosening compared to iliac screws (IS), leading to advancements in technology with osseointegrative S2AI screws to increase bone integration and stability. Though the overall increased stability is desired, this can also pose an obstacle if removal of the implants are required. Case Description: A 66-year-old female s/p T10-S2 posterior spinal fusion (PSF) nine months prior presented with sepsis, necessitating the removal of the implants including osseointegrative iFuse Granite S2AI implants (SI-BONE, Inc.; Santa Clara, CA). The S2AI implants were unable to be removed with their associated screw driver due to the extensive bone ongrowth and ingrowth, necessitating different techniques for screw removal. The right S2AI screw's inner shank was disengaged from the outer sleeve, followed by removal with an easy out device after the TORQ Trephine (SI-BONE, Inc.; Santa Clara, CA) passed along the outer sleeve. The left S2AI screw's tulip head was in an unfavorable position and therefore cross threaded from the inner shank with a rongeur. The left S2AI screw was then trephined in a similar fashion and removed with its associated driver. Ultimately the operation was successful, and the implants were removed by non-traditional techniques that were unaccounted for. Conclusions: Due to the osseointegrative properties of the implant, removal of screws implanted more than nine months prior using the associated driver is often not possible. The purpose of this report is to highlight tips and challenges in removing osseointegrative spinopelvic screws to improve screw removal techniques and implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.