ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Diagnostic Challenges in Differentiating Unicystic Ameloblastoma From Odontogenic Cysts: Report of Two Cases.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Challenges in Differentiating Unicystic Ameloblastoma From Odontogenic Cysts: Report of Two Cases.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ameloblastomas are benign odontogenic tumors characterized by local aggressiveness and a high potential for recurrence. Unicystic ameloblastoma (UA) is an uncommon variant that often mimics odontogenic cysts, making preoperative diagnosis challenging. Early and accurate differentiation is essential for guiding appropriate treatment planning and minimizing the risk of recurrence. This study is aimed at reporting two cases highlighting the diagnostic dilemma posed by UA. The first case involves a 65-year-old male patient with a well-defined unilocular radiolucency extending from Teeth 35 to 44. Clinical and radiographic findings initially suggested a benign odontogenic cyst. However, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) revealed cortical perforation, and histopathological examination confirmed a diagnosis of a mural unicystic ameloblastoma. The second case concerns a 20-year-old female patient who consulted with the chief complain of incidental discovery of a radiolucent image associated with an impacted wisdom mandibular right tooth during follow-up orthodontic treatment on panoramic radiography. CBCT showed cortical expansion and thinning, with mandibular canal displacement. The differential diagnosis included a dentigerous cyst, an odontogenic keratocyst, and UA. Histopathological analysis confirmed a follicular ameloblastoma. These cases emphasize the importance of correlating clinical, radiographic, and histopathological findings to differentiate UA from cystic odontogenic lesions. Advanced imaging modalities such as CBCT, combined with histological examination, remain essential for a precise diagnosis and suitable treatment plan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.