Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42158036›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2026

Management of Norovirus Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Scoping Review.

Thida Maung Myint, Jonathan Hand, Adam Lowe, Camille N Kotton, Sharon C-A Chen, Justin Beardsley, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Germaine Wong, Samuel Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thida Maung MyintCentre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7545-331X
Jonathan HandThe University of Queensland Medical School, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA.
Adam LoweMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston (MUSC), Charleston, SC.
Camille N KottonTransplant and Immunocompromised Host Service, Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Sharon C-A ChenSydney Infectious Diseases Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Justin BeardsleyTransplant and Immunocompromised Host Service, Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Armando Teixeira-PintoCentre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Germaine WongCentre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Samuel ChanNew Medical Education Australia Pty Ltd, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Norovirus infection causes significant morbidity in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, yet few treatments are available, and evidence for efficacy is sparse. In this scoping review, we identify and evaluate potential interventions for managing norovirus infections in SOT recipients. Methods: We searched electronic databases from inception to July 6, 2025. Eligible studies were analyzed for participants' characteristics, intervention types, and reported outcomes. Results: After screening 245 abstracts, 58 studies were included (1 randomized controlled trial, 27 cohort studies, 5 case series and 25 case reports), mainly from the United States. Transplant types included kidney (n = 36), liver (n = 12), cardiac (n = 12), pulmonary (n = 7), pancreas (n = 6), small bowel (n = 7), and multiorgan (n = 13) transplants. The most frequently reported primary outcome was resolution of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Interventions were diverse: immunosuppression modification (n = 14), nitazoxanide (n = 6), IVIG (n = 3), oral immunoglobulin (n = 10), combination of these (n = 19), fecal transplant (n = 2), supportive management (n = 4), and others not classified (n = 5). Limited quality evidence for the resolution of gastrointestinal symptoms was reported for immunosuppression modification (n = 7/14), nitazoxanide (n = 4/6), IVIG (n = 2/3), oral immunoglobulin alone (n = 10/10), fecal transplant (n = 2/2), supportive treatment (n = 4/4), and a combination of treatments (n = 10/19). A lack of clinical improvement was described in 13 of 58 studies. Conclusions: A wide range of interventions has been used to manage norovirus infections in SOT recipients; however, the evidence is limited to observational studies, and the findings are uncertain. High-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish treatment efficacy and safety.

Identifiers

PMID42158036
PMCPMC13183116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.