ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Development and internal validation of a machine learning model for predicting intracranial infection after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a two-center retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intracranial infection (ICI) is a serious complication following spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and is associated with prolonged intensive care, increased morbidity, and poor functional outcomes. Early identification of patients at high risk for post-ICH ICI remains difficult because of heterogeneous clinical presentations and complex interactions among neurological severity, systemic inflammation, and treatment-related factors. This study aimed to develop and validate a clinically applicable machine learning model for early prediction of ICI after ICH. Methods: This two-center retrospective study included 1,317 patients with spontaneous ICH admitted to two hospitals in the same province, between 2015 and 2024. Baseline demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological variables obtained within 24 h of admission were used to construct the prediction models. Twelve machine learning algorithms were compared, and a Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) model demonstrated the best overall performance. Model discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis, calibration plots, precision-recall curves, decision curve analysis, and 10-fold cross-validation. Associations between model-predicted risk, ICI occurrence, and 180-day functional outcomes were assessed. Results: Intracranial infection occurred in 165 patients (12.5%). The LGBM model showed excellent test-set discrimination (AUC = 0.923), and supplementary 10-fold cross-validation on the overall cohort suggested relatively stable performance across folds (mean AUC = 0.933). Higher model-predicted risk was independently and nonlinearly associated with increased ICI risk and was significantly associated with unfavorable 180-day functional outcomes. Conclusion: This ML model showed good performance for the early prediction of ICI after ICH using routinely available clinical data and may support risk stratification in neurocritical care settings. However, because only internal validation was performed, further external validation is needed before broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.