ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Pre-viewing context and visual attention in museum scenes: an exploratory eye-tracking study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Exhibit Text Presentation Types on Visual Attention Patterns and Cognitive Load in Digital Museums: An Eye-Tracking Study.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual attention in interpretive settings is shaped not only by image saliency but also by the context viewers receive before viewing. However, how different context formats relate to attention allocation in curated visual scenes remains under-specified, and findings are often sensitive to the evaluation metric used. We conducted an exploratory free-viewing eye-tracking study in which participants viewed keyframes from museum-oriented scenes after brief pre-viewing context presented in different formats. The dataset comprises gaze recordings from 10 participants across 30 images. Attention patterns were evaluated by comparing observed gaze distributions with a saliency-model baseline and summarizing correspondence through a multi-metric profile. The results indicate systematic block-level differences in gaze-reference correspondence and variability, suggesting that pre-viewing context can be reflected in where attention concentrates, while different metrics highlight different aspects of deviation. These findings offer a compact, metric-aware way to report context-associated attention differences in small-sample studies and inform interpretive design decisions where textual and graphical cues are used to shape viewing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.