Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42157981›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

Isolating perceptual conflict: a theoretical and methodological analysis of the Task-Irrelevant Paradigm.

Yian Guo, Yanan Wu, Yuanqing Yao, Ke You, Guangping Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yian Guo *School of Education and Psychology, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou, China.
Yanan Wu *Suqian Zeda Vocational and Technical College, Suqian, China.
Yuanqing YaoAnhui Finance and Trade Vocational College, Hefei, China.
Ke YouSchool of Education and Psychology, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou, China.
Guangping ZhaoSchool of Education and Psychology, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conflict interference effect, exemplified by the Stroop effect, serves as a key indicator for studying conflict processing and cognitive control and is typically categorized into two conflict components within conflict classification theories. Perceptual conflict is constrained by task settings in typical paradigms, making precise detection challenging. This article reviews the literature on perceptual conflict, proposes the Task-Irrelevant Paradigm (TIP) as an experimental strategy to independently investigate perceptual conflict, and provides a more systematic analysis of its theoretical, empirical, and cognitive-processing foundations. The TIP offers an effective method for more deeply exploring perceptual conflict, and a clearer framework for understanding how such conflict may persist under task-irrelevant conditions, demonstrating broad applicability across conflict interference paradigms and potential for studying implicit associations. Current empirical research involving the TIP is still relatively limited, and future studies should focus on refining task designs, clarifying boundary conditions, and advancing multimodal integration research.

Indexed as

cognitive controlconflict interference paradigmperceptual conflictstroop effecttask-irrelevant paradigm

Identifiers

PMID42157981
PMCPMC13180940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.