ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026
Framing menstrual regulation as a pathway to advancing reproductive autonomy in restrictive legal contexts.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While 60 countries have expanded legal abortion access over the past three decades, implementation gaps persist, necessitating innovative approaches beyond conventional law reform. This paper examines the concept of menstrual regulation, which refers to actions taken to bring back a late period for an individual who may or may not be pregnant. Although only formally institutionalized in Bangladesh, the practice of menstrual regulation has resonance to how women in diverse contexts perceive delayed menses and possible early pregnancy. In this paper, we trace the evolution of the menstrual regulation program in Bangladesh, from an emergency post-war intervention to its integration in the national family planning program, through periods of service expansion and decline, and explore the substantial impacts and persistent challenges faced in its implementation. We then examine the global evidence beyond Bangladesh, which reveals related practices taking place across Asia, Africa, Latin America, and Europe, demonstrating widespread cultural resonance and policy applicability. We argue that by working within the ambiguity of early pregnancy status and using linguistic ambiguity and strategic policy framing to navigate legal restrictions, menstrual regulation offers a pragmatic, contextually responsive pathway to reproductive autonomy when conventional abortion law reform is untenable. However, advocates must ensure that menstrual regulation serves as a step toward, not a substitute for, comprehensive abortion law reform and full realization of reproductive rights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.