Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42157916›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

"Reactions in Leprosy: Updated Insights Into Pathophysiology, Clinical Spectrum, and Therapeutic Approaches-A Narrative Review".

Bhaskar Gupta, Manesha Singh, Mohamad Goldust, Kinnor Das, Surajit Gorai, Prajwal Pudasaini, Seema Sitaula, Achyut Pokhrel, Esna Thapa, Sunil Jaiswal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bhaskar GuptaDepartment of Dermatology Silchar Medical College Ghungoor India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0701-2018
Manesha SinghManesha Skin Care, Gayatri Nagar Motihari India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7778-688X
Mohamad GoldustDepartment of Dermatology Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9615-1246
Kinnor DasDepartment of Dermatology Apollo Clinic Silchar Silchar India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1719-3465
Surajit GoraiDepartment of Dermatology Apollo Multispeciality Hospitals Kolkata India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1258-4245
Prajwal PudasainiDepartment of Dermatology Civil Service Hospital Kathmandu Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8549-625X
Seema SitaulaDepartment of Dermatology Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital Maharajgunj Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7878-224X
Achyut PokhrelChitwan Skin Clinic Bharatpur Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1330-6403
Esna ThapaSahid Gangalal National Heart Centre Kathmandu Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9673-4656
Sunil JaiswalDepartment of Dermatology Chitwan Medical College Bharatpur Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3905-5247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Reaction in leprosy is an immune-mediated acute inflammatory episodes that occur in the natural course of Hansen's disease. Reaction can occur before, during, or after starting multidrug therapy and is a major cause of nerve damage, morbidity, and disability in affected individuals. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview on the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and current management strategies for reactions in leprosy. Methods: A narrative review of published literature was conducted focusing on the risk factors, immunopathogenesis, clinical presentation, severity scoring, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic approaches of Type 1 (reversal reaction), Type 2 (Erythema Nodosum Leprosum), and Type 3 (Lucio phenomenon) leprosy reactions. Relevant studies, guidelines, and reviews were analyzed using the databases PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar from 2005 to 2025, to provide an updated synthesis of knowledge. The keywords used included: "leprosy reactions", "type 1 reaction", "type 2 reaction", "lucio phenomenon", "immunopathogenesis", "clinical presentation", "severity scoring", and "management". Articles were screened based on relevance to the topic and selected through consensus among the authors. Results: Type 1 leprosy reaction is a delayed-type hypersensitivity response due to enhanced cell-mediated immunity, leading to the aggravation of pre-existing skin lesions and neuritis. Type 2 reaction is an immune-complex mediated phenomenon associated with systemic symptoms along with the fresh appearance of reddish subcutaneous nodules. Lucio phenomenon, which is due to endothelial cell injury, usually presents with tender purpura on the extremities which becomes necrotic and ulcerated. Management can be tailored according to the severity of the reactional episode. Conclusion: Swift identification of leprosy reaction is important as it can be the first manifestation of leprosy in a large number of patients, and if not treated at an early stage, it may lead to deformity and disability.

Indexed as

infectious diseasesleprosyleprosy reactionMycobacterium leprae

Identifiers

PMID42157916
PMCPMC13180797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.