ArticleCurrent genomics2025
Two-Stage Multi-View Graph Spectral Clustering for Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data.
Article in Current genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DECANT: decoupling mechanism from context in single-cell drug perturbation representation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Evolving non-invasive biomarkers in NSCLC immunotherapy: integrating liquid biopsy and multi-omics profiling for precision oncology.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The appearance of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data has brought a distinctive perspective to studying gene expression at the cell level. However, it faces challenges such as large data volume, sparsity, heterogeneity, and the curse of dimensionality. Current clustering methods still face many challenges in studying cell type distribution and have not utilized the structural relationship information between cells. Methods: To avoid the insufficiency of the single characteristic space of scRNA-seq data in characterizing cell function, this paper constructs multiple view characteristic spaces and utilizes multi-view learning to characterize scRNA-seq information from distinctive perspectives comprehensively. In multi-view learning, the similarity graph is divided into weighted learning and structural learning stages. Through weighting the multi-view similarity graphs, the significance of diverse views and features is underscored. During the structural stage, the emphasis is placed on uncovering potential relationships among different views by preserving common edges in the multi-view similarity graphs. The optimization of the attribute and structure graphs was conducted separately by the alternating direction multiplier method. Results: The performance of the MVGSC was validated using eight different scales of real scRNA-seq datasets, and the experimental results showed that the proposed multi-view clustering method significantly surpasses other single-view clustering methods and multi-view clustering methods. Discussion: When the features of scRNA-seq data are complex and there are significant differences between views, the two-stage multi-view graph method can better capture the complex relationships in the data, demonstrating superior performance compared to a single framework. Conclusion: Two-stage multi-view learning can more accurately capture complex relationships in the data, thereby improving the accuracy of the model. It can also better capture consistency and complementary information in multi-view data, thereby enhancing the generalization ability of the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.