Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42157891›Full record

ReviewChemical science2026

Recycling nickel-rich cathodes toward structural and functional circularity: a perspective.

Yuhan Huang, Haoyang Xu, Yimin Zeng, Han Xue, Ge Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuhan HuangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada ge.li@ualberta.ca.
Haoyang XuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada ge.li@ualberta.ca.
Yimin ZengNatural Resources Canada, CanmetMATERIALS Hamilton Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2685-7048
Han XueNatural Resources Canada, CanmetMATERIALS Hamilton Canada.
Ge LiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada ge.li@ualberta.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1978-2976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing use of nickel-rich (Ni ≥ 0.6) layered oxide cathodes in lithium-ion batteries creates an urgent need for recycling, for which existing elemental-recovery methods are not well suited. Unlike process-based classifications, the present framework evaluates recycling routes by whether they recover only the elemental inventory, preserve the layered crystal framework, or restore and intentionally improve electrochemical function. Here, we reconceptualize cathode recycling as three progressive levels of material circularity: elemental recovery, structural preservation, and functional restoration. The specific degradation modes of Ni-rich cathodes, including surface rock-salt reconstruction, cation disorder, and intergranular fracture, not only limit the effectiveness of conventional pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical processes but also define the precise materials science targets that higher-level recycling strategies must address. Against this framework, we critically assess advances in direct recycling and upcycling, highlighting relithiation chemistry, molten-salt recrystallization, and Artificial Intelligence-guided process control as the most capable approaches for achieving structural and functional circularity at scale. Closing the loop for Ni-rich cathodes requires more than just incremental improvements to existing recovery methods. It calls for a strategic shift in recycling research to preserve and restore the cathode's crystal structure.

Identifiers

PMID42157891
PMCPMC13182620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.