Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42157871›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

De-pathologizing multiethnic youth: a matched-sample comparison of multiethnic and monoethnic adolescents' psychological health.

Hali Kil, Serena Shukla, Amanda Hodges

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hali KilDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Serena ShuklaDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Amanda HodgesDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Multiethnic youth are often pathologized in clinical settings, owing to their negative experiences with discrimination, social rejection, and multiethnic identity navigation. While much research suggests that multiethnic youth experience heightened mental health difficulties compared to monoethnic youth, some research suggests that multiethnic youth report positive psychological well-being. The present work aimed to address this inconsistency by comparing mental health and well-being in a sociodemographically matched sample of multiethnic and monoethnic youth. Method: Participants were 14- to 18-year-old multiethnic ( Results: Matched sample comparisons showed that multiethnic youth experienced better mental health on both anxiety and depression symptomology compared to monoethnic youth, although effect sizes were small. No significant differences emerged for well-being. However, trends in comparisons differed by specific ethnic heritage of multiethnic youth and monoethnic youth being compared. Conclusions: Our findings suggest to caution against pathologizing multiethnic youth as experiencing elevated psychological difficulties compared to monoethnic youth solely based on multiethnic classification. We highlight the need to target sociodemographic factors contributing to psychological health of all youth, regardless of their ethnic identities.

Indexed as

mental healthmultiethnicpropensity score matchingwell-beingyouth

Identifiers

PMID42157871
PMCPMC13180805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.