ArticlePathologica2026
AI for cervical cancer screening on whole slide images: opportunities with open-source simple tools.
Article in Pathologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cervical cancer remains a major global health burden, where early detection is critical. Cytological and histological assessments aim to identify precancerous squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). While artificial intelligence and machine learning have shown promise, most approaches rely on cytology or are not tailored for SIL classification. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate a weakly supervised, pixel-level machine learning framework for the histological classification of low grade and high grade SIL in whole slide images (WSIs). Specifically, we sought to assess whether an open source segmentation pipeline trained on sparsely annotated WSIs could accurately support slide-level diagnostic interpretation while minimizing annotation burden and maintaining clinical interpretability. Methods: We propose a weakly supervised machine learning framework for classifying low grade and high grade SILs in whole-slide histological images. Using Random Forest classifiers for pixel-level segmentation, the system mimics pathologists by quantifying tissue components. Training required only sparse annotations from a limited set of WSIs, yielding millions of pixel-level samples and reducing annotation burden. Results: Applied on a test set of 309 cervical WSIs, the system achieved over 96% concordance with expert pathologists, correctly distinguishing low grade LSIL, high grade HSIL, and normal epithelium, with only one false negative and a 7-10 false positives, depending on the used model. Conclusions: Our approach offers accurate, interpretable, and low-cost diagnostic support, with potential for integration into routine workflows, especially in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.