Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42157700›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026

Lipid Class Prediction from MS1 Data using Gaussian Graphical Models.

Thomas Rix, Caroline Jane Sands, Alma Villaseñor, Ana Gradillas, Coral Barbas, Elena Chekmeneva, Elizabeth J Want, Timothy M D Ebbels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas RixSection of Bioinformatics, Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-1887-8941
Caroline Jane SandsNational Phenome Centre, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, U.K.
Alma VillaseñorCentro de Metabolómica y Bioanálisis (CEMBIO), Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Urbanización Monteprıncipe, Boadilla del Monte 28660, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6652-2739
Ana GradillasCentro de Metabolómica y Bioanálisis (CEMBIO), Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Urbanización Monteprıncipe, Boadilla del Monte 28660, Spain.
Coral BarbasCentro de Metabolómica y Bioanálisis (CEMBIO), Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Urbanización Monteprıncipe, Boadilla del Monte 28660, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4722-491X
Elena ChekmenevaNational Phenome Centre, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-1807-2398
Elizabeth J WantSection of Bioanalytical Chemistry, Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-7433-8632
Timothy M D EbbelsSection of Bioinformatics, Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-3372-8423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) untargeted analysis enables comprehensive lipid profiling of biological samples. However, system-level interpretation is often limited by the large number of unannotated features. Assigning features to lipid classes provides a higher-level, yet informative, overview that complements detailed structural analysis and supports biological interpretation at the class level. Recent advances in the systematic prediction of chemical class using tandem mass spectrometry (MS2) help address this; however, a substantial proportion of features in untargeted LC-MS data sets are typically characterized only at the MS1 level. Here, we present a workflow to systematically predict the lipid class from MS1-only data in untargeted LC-MS, without requiring prior annotations or MS2. Motivated by previous research showing that Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) estimated from feature intensities can encode the lipid class structure, our method, GgmLipidClassifier (GLC), combines conventional accurate-mass database searching with a GGM-derived network structure in a unified scoring framework to predict lipid class according to the LIPID MAPS Structure Database (LMSD) ontology. Across three human serum and plasma data sets, GLC achieved overall accuracies of 82-90% at the LMSD main class-level and 72-86% at the lipid subclass level, with improved accuracy and reduced uncertainty compared to closest-

Indexed as

LipidsLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansNormal DistributionTandem Mass SpectrometryLipids

Identifiers

PMID42157700
PMCPMC13234823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.