Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42157686›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

Flight in the dark: different responses to darkness in flying insects.

Roni Maya, Noam Lerner, Bar Karov, Noam Tsory, Richard C Terrile, Orit Peleg, Tsevi Beatus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roni MayaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel.
Noam LernerSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0788-3283
Bar KarovSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1135-2549
Noam TsorySchool of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel.
Richard C TerrileDepartment of Computer Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Orit PelegDepartment of Computer Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9481-7967
Tsevi BeatusSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9875-2766

Funding

Azrieli FoundationHebrew University of JerusalemIsrael Science Foundation 1851/17Israel Science Foundation 1852/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision-based stabilization is crucial for flying animals, and among these, flying insects provide a range of experimental systems for studying vision-related locomotion resilience and sensory integration; for example, under low-light conditions. Behavioral experiments on flying insects can provide a top-down approach for setting limits to their sensory capabilities in such conditions, yet the flight kinematics of insects with minimal visual cues has received little attention. Here, we compared the flight of fruit flies, mosquitoes and honey bees under continuous low light and upon sudden mid-flight darkness. While honey bees typically do not fly in the dark and upon a sudden mid-flight darkness crash within 100 ms, fruit flies and mosquitoes can fly under continuous low-light levels and upon sudden darkness exhibit a well-defined response maneuver. The sequence consists of a visual-motor delay, increasing wingbeat frequency, pitching-up, slowing down and changing course, all within a 250 ms observation time. A similar response was also observed under a sudden transition to partial darkness, which better mimics naturally occurring conditions. The stark differences between the honey bees' and dipterans' responses can be attributed to the dipterans' higher light sensitivity and to the fact that they have halteres - gyroscopic organs that enable them to measure their body attitude regardless of vision. Such free-flight experiments could be combined with further electrophysiological characterization of insect light sensitivity and adaptation to better understand the dynamic role of vision and sensory fusion in flight.

Indexed as

CulicidaeDarknessDrosophila melanogasterFlight, AnimalAnimalsBeesBiomechanical PhenomenaLightAntennaApisCulexDarknessDrosophilaFlight kinematicsFruit flyHoney beeInsect flightLow lightMosquitoPerturbation

Identifiers

PMID42157686
PMCPMC13245909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.