ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025
"They're not used to people asking what they need": work processes and care practices in feminist abortion accompaniment - a qualitative study.
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This qualitative study examines the work process of feminist activists who provide accompaniment for self-managed abortions in a major urban centre in Brazil, where abortion remains criminalised in most circumstances. Based on in-depth interviews with eight accompaniers, and drawing on Brazilian collective health and feminist ethics of care, it analyses how they integrate technique, ethics, political commitment, and social awareness, thereby transforming accompaniment into a genuine practice of care. Findings show that accompaniment recognises those cared for as subjects with knowledge, desires, and evolving needs, rather than as passive recipients. Care is organised collectively but always tailored and responsive to the needs of each person, in an interactive, critical, and reflexive manner. In doing so, accompaniers combine technical-scientific knowledge with experiential knowledge built through prior care and exchanges within trusted networks. By engaging across all stages of the process, and guided by a project whose ultimate purpose is to make abortion a good experience for those accompanied, accompaniers prevent the fragmentation and alienation of care work. Accompaniment thus emerges as a model of care grounded in radical needs: needs that arise within existing social conditions but cannot be fully satisfied within them. Once recognised and collectively articulated, these needs expose the limits of the existing order and become a source of pressure for social transformation. The high personal cost of this activism, marked by overload, insecurity, and invisibility, challenges its sustainability and expansion. By describing its constitutive elements, this study broadens understanding of abortion accompaniment and underscores the need for public policies that integrate community-based knowledge, values and practices to foster more humanised, justice-oriented models of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.