Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42157582›Full record

Trial reportActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026

Effect of opportunistic salpingectomy at hysterectomy on anti-Müllerian hormone: A substudy of a randomized trial.

Anna Darelius, Annika Idahl, Karin Sundfeldt, Annika Strandell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03045965 (Hysterectomy and Opportunistic Salpingectomy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03045965 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Hysterectomy and Opportunistic Salpingectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorGöteborg UniversityRan2017 to 2053Enrolled4,400ConditionsOvarian Cancer, ComplicationArmsSalpingectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna DareliusDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Annika IdahlDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Karin SundfeldtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Annika StrandellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

Cancerfonden CAN 21 1408 PJCancerfonden CAN 21-848 PJJane and Dan Olsson Foundations 2016-49Swedish state under the ALF-agreement ALFGBG-965130Swedish state under the ALF-agreement ALFGBG-971191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOpportunistic salpingectomy during benign hysterectomy with ovarian preservation has become a preventive approach to epithelial ovarian cancer, particularly high-grade serous carcinoma, given evidence that it originates in the Fallopian tubes. However, the long-term impact of the procedure on ovarian function remains unknown. This study assessed whether opportunistic salpingectomy at benign hysterectomy affects ovarian function compared with no salpingectomy 1 year after surgery. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis is a noninferiority substudy of the national register-based randomized controlled trial HOPPSA (Hysterectomy and OPPortunistic SAlpingectomy), registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03045965) on 8 February 2017. Women under 55 years planned for a benign hysterectomy at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital were randomized to hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy or hysterectomy-only. Blood samples were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively and analyzed for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) by Access2 immunoassay. The primary outcome was absolute change in AMH over time in the per-protocol population. Secondary outcomes were the relative change in AMH and level of AMH 1 year after surgery. The difference between groups was estimated by analysis of covariance, adjusted for baseline AMH, age groups, operative route, and time from surgery to second sampling. Multiple imputation was applied on missing samples. The noninferiority margin was set to 0.125 μg/L.

resultsBetween 16 August 2018 and 6 September 2023, 89 women were randomized to hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy (n = 46) or hysterectomy-only (n = 43). After exclusions due to prior ovarian surgery or not receiving the allocated surgery, 37 women were analyzed in each group. Mean age was 45.1 and 46.3 years in respective groups and mean body mass index was 29.5 and 27.2 kg/m

conclusionsNoninferiority was not demonstrated for opportunistic salpingectomy at hysterectomy compared with hysterectomy-only regarding ovarian function assessed by AMH. Absolute reduction in AMH levels appeared to be similar in both groups, with an unexpectedly large variability in AMH reduction suggesting a more pronounced decline in some individuals.

Indexed as

Anti-Mullerian HormoneHysterectomySalpingectomyAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsAnti-Mullerian Hormoneanti‐Müllerian hormoneepithelial ovarian cancerhysterectomyopportunistic salpingectomyovarian function

Identifiers

PMID42157582
PMCPMC13356485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.