Trial reportEuropean journal of neurology2026
Evaluation of Sustained Disease Control With Nipocalimab Versus Placebo in the Phase 3 Vivacity-MG3 Study.
Trial report in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Rescue Therapy to Mechanism-Based Sequencing in Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Narrative Review with an Illustrative Clinical Case.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) frequently have variable and fluctuating symptoms. Treatments providing long-term, sustained disease control are essential for improving function and health-related quality of life.
methodsIn the phase 3 Vivacity-MG3 study, nipocalimab improved clinical outcomes in adults with gMG when added to standard-of-care (SOC) therapy. These post hoc analyses further assessed the ability of nipocalimab to produce sustained responses over 24 weeks, using the following response categories for total score improvements in Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG), respectively: Meaningful Clinical Improvement (MCI; ≥ 2- and ≥ 3-point), Substantial Improvement (SI; ≥ 3- and ≥ 4-point), Considerable Improvement (CIP; ≥ 4- and ≥ 5), Composite Response (CR; MG-ADL improvement ≥ 2-points plus QMG improvement ≥ 3-points), and Minimal Symptom Expression (MSE; MG-ADL 0 or 1).
resultsSignificantly higher percentages of nipocalimab-treated than placebo-treated participants achieved MG-ADL MCI, SI, and CIP, sustained for ≥ 12 consecutive weeks; achievement of these outcomes occurred as early as week 1 among nipocalimab-treated participants. Similar results were observed for QMG MCI, SI, and CIP. Significantly higher percentages of nipocalimab-treated participants achieved CR, sustained for ≥ 8 consecutive weeks versus placebo; the likelihood of achieving sustained CR for ≥ 8 weeks was higher with nipocalimab (odds ratio = 6.3). Nipocalimab-treated participants were 4-fold more likely to achieve MSE, sustained for ≥ 8 consecutive weeks versus placebo (p = 0.022). MSE and CR were achieved earlier among nipocalimab-treated participants.
conclusionsNipocalimab treatment improves gMG symptoms earlier than placebo and provides meaningful and long-term sustained disease control over 24 weeks among participants with gMG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.