ArticleANZ journal of surgery
Changing Aetiology of Perforated Peptic Ulcers: Rising Impact of Non-Steroidal-Anti-Inflammatories in Western Australia.
Article in ANZ journal of surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeptic ulcer disease (PUD) continues to be a health issue, mainly due to Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Despite better treatment of H. pylori and use of proton pump inhibitors, the rate of reduction in PUD complications is slowing down. This may be predominantly because of increased NSAID and aspirin use, especially among older adults and those in higher socioeconomic regions. Understanding changing causes of perforated PUD is important for prevention and care.
methodsThis retrospective audit reviewed patients who underwent surgical repair for peptic ulcer perforations at tertiary hospitals in Western Australia from 2010 to 2018. The study assessed patient demographics, ulcer sites, risk factors (including NSAID/aspirin use and H. pylori status), eradication, and follow-up care to evaluate the relative impact of NSAID use and H. pylori infection on ulcer perforation.
resultsA cause for perforated PUD was identified in 78% of 359 patients; 72% had a history of NSAID or aspirin use and 42% tested positive for H. pylori . More gastric than duodenal perforations were observed. Practices around H. pylori testing, eradication, and follow-up varied. Malignant gastric perforation was rare.
conclusionNSAID/Aspirin use may be surpassing H. pylori as the main cause of perforated PUD in Western Australia, mirroring global patterns. H. pylori remains important but identifying NSAID use as a modifiable risk and standardising testing, eradication, and follow-up-including endoscopy-are needed. These findings should guide clinical practice for post-operative and preventive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.