ArticlePlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2026
Rapid disruption of pollination function by the invasive plant Impatiens glandulifera.
Article in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological invasions can disrupt plant-pollinator interactions by altering pollinator behaviour and pollen transfer dynamics, yet the mechanisms and timing of these effects remain poorly understood. Most studies rely on observational comparisons or removal experiments in long-established invasions, but little is known about changes in pollination function at the onset of invasion. We investigated the pollination of Stachys sylvatica by combining field comparisons between pristine and invaded sites with an experimental introduction of Impatiens glandulifera into a previously uninvaded site. We quantified pollinator visitation, pollen loads carried by bumblebees, and conspecific and invasive pollen deposition on S. sylvatica stigmas. Across multiple field sites, stigmas of S. sylvatica in pristine habitats received approximately three times more conspecific pollen than those in invaded sites. Bumblebees dominated the pollinator assemblage across all sites, and in invaded habitats, they carried pollen loads strongly dominated by I. glandulifera. During the experimental introduction, bumblebees rapidly incorporated I. glandulifera into their foraging, while conspecific pollen deposition on S. sylvatica stigmas declined sharply, with 81.5% reduction within 4 days. Our results demonstrate that invasion by I. glandulifera can rapidly impair pollination function of a co-flowering native species through changes in pollen transport and transfer efficiency, even before strong shifts in visitation patterns become apparent. By capturing early invasion dynamics through experimental introduction, this study highlights the importance of direct pollen-based metrics for understanding how plant invasions disrupt pollination processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.