Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42157463›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2026

Trends in Female Representation Across Five Competitive Surgical Specialties (2013-2025): A Call for Sustained Equity Efforts.

Mehek Sharma, Vikram Sharma, Bridget Sinnott, Adam Davis, David LaChance, Anannya Das, Kelly Homlar, Carlos Isales, Sadanand Fulzele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mehek SharmaDepartment of Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Vikram SharmaDepartment of Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Bridget SinnottDepartment of Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Adam DavisDepartment of Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
David LaChanceDepartment of Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Anannya DasDepartment of Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Kelly HomlarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Carlos IsalesDepartment of Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Sadanand FulzeleDepartment of Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3510-6759

Funding

Augusta University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParity in medical school admissions has improved, yet female representation remains disproportionately low in many competitive surgical specialties. Although initiatives promoting equity by sex in medicine have gained momentum, their long-term impact on surgical residency programs across various specialties remains unclear.

objectiveThis study evaluated 12-year trends (2013-2025) in sex representation among applicants and residents in five highly competitive US surgical specialties: neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, plastic surgery (integrated), thoracic surgery (integrated), and vascular surgery (integrated).

methodsPublicly available data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) were analyzed to assess sex-based trends among U.S. medical school matriculants and quantify yearly changes in the number and percentage of female applicants and active residents. Longitudinal trends were assessed to evaluate both proportional representation and retention across specialties.

resultsFrom 2013 to 2025, female matriculants to US M.D.-granting schools rose from 47.20% to 55.10%, exceeding 50% since 2017. All five surgical specialties showed an increase in the number of female applications, with orthopedic surgery showing the greatest number of applicants (127-419). Plastic surgery showed the highest percentage of female applicants in 2024-2025 (53.38%), followed by vascular surgery (33.19%), thoracic surgery (31.58%), neurosurgery (27.43%), and orthopedic surgery (23.77%). Representation of active female residents and acceptance rates also increased across all surgical specialties. Upward trends were consistent in neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and plastic surgery, whereas thoracic surgery and vascular surgery exhibited more fluctuation.

conclusionsDespite rising acceptance rates, sex-based inequity remains in competitive surgical specialties. Plastic surgery is an outlier, with female applicants constituting the majority, in line with trends in medical school matriculation. However, women remain underrepresented in orthopedic surgery and neurosurgery. Sustaining progress will require targeted efforts to address cultural and institutional barriers, expand mentorship, and foster supportive training environments.

Indexed as

Gender EquityInternship and ResidencyPhysicians, WomenSchools, MedicalSpecialties, SurgicalFemaleHumansMaleNeurosurgerySchool Admission CriteriaThoracic SurgeryUnited Statescompetitive surgical specialtiesequityfemale representationresidency match

Identifiers

PMID42157463
PMCPMC13356532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.