Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42157408›Full record

ReviewActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026

The socioeconomic burden of pelvic floor disorders.

Ian Milsom, Ida E K Nilsson, Jwan Al-Mukhtar Othman, Jennie Larsudd-Kåverud, Adrian Wagg, Maria Gyhagen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ian MilsomGothenburg Continence Research Centre, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0400-5509
Ida E K NilssonGothenburg Continence Research Centre, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jwan Al-Mukhtar OthmanGothenburg Continence Research Centre, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jennie Larsudd-KåverudGothenburg Continence Research Centre, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5050-0343
Adrian WaggGothenburg Continence Research Centre, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Maria GyhagenGothenburg Continence Research Centre, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7355-8644

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) such as pelvic organ prolapse (POP), urinary incontinence (UI), and fecal incontinence (FI) affect millions of women throughout the world. The aim of this review was to describe the socioeconomic burden of PFDs in women. A comprehensive literature search was performed in relevant databases to identify articles on this topic. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders reaches up to 46% in adult women and many have >1 PFD. PFDs impair a woman's well-being, quality of life, and sexual function and prevent many women from participating in recreational and sporting activities. UI alone constitutes a major health problem affecting the lives of more than 500 million persons worldwide. Combined FI and UI have been reported in 10% of women living in the community, increasing to almost 50% in nursing home residents. The prevalence of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in women has been reported to be between 4% and 11%. The costs of PFDs to health care systems and society are enormous, and approximately one in five women will undergo surgery for genital prolapse or UI by the age of 85 years. Global demographic trends regarding the aging population indicate that the prevalence of both UI and FI will rise in the coming years, significantly increasing the health and societal burden as well as the economic costs for both patients and health service payer. At present, PFDs incur a huge socioeconomic burden on women throughout the world. Management strategies during delivery should be individualized to reduce the burden of pelvic floor dysfunction currently occurring following vaginal birth.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessPelvic Floor DisordersFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansPelvic Organ ProlapsePrevalenceQuality of LifeSocioeconomic FactorsUrinary Incontinencefecal incontinenceobstetric anal sphincter injurypelvic floor dysfunctionpelvic organ prolapseurinary incontinencevaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID42157408
PMCPMC13308987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.