ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026
Analysis of circumstances in police-related fatalities comparing medical examiner records with a public database.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing circumstances surrounding police-related deaths is hampered by the absence of an official national database. The National Vital Statistics System, which compiles death certificates filed by medical examiners and coroners, misses approximately one-half of deaths due to police use of force. The void has been filled by the emergence of several unofficial databases sourced from public records, which have been used, for example, to estimate the number of fatal police shootings of unarmed individuals. However, these public databases have not been validated against official records. Furthermore, there have been no attempts to explore the complexity of circumstances leading to police-related fatalities. The present study was conducted to compare information in one public database, Fatal Encounters (FE), with matched records from the King County Medical Examiner's Office (ME) and to measure the role of overlapping circumstances leading to fatal outcomes. For this purpose, the two data sources were linked by names. Circumstantial elements were extracted, categorized, and analyzed according to Manner of Death, Pre-Custody criteria, and Race assignments. Overlapping circumstances were resolved by the calculation of conditional probabilities. The results found 172 matched records in which agreements between the two sources ranged from 70% to 100%. Disagreements were present in whether the decedent was unarmed and not fleeing. The distribution of deaths according to race was disproportionate relative to the county population. The study demonstrated the importance of data in measuring police-related fatalities and the need for caution in interpreting data that does not fully encompass the range of complex circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.