ArticleDiabetes care2026
Food Coloring Additives and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort.
Article in Diabetes care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- From Food Systems to Gut Microbiota: Dietary Substrates, Microbial Exposure and One Health.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate potential association between exposure to food coloring additives and type 2 diabetes incidence. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThe study followed 108,723 participants (79.2% female, mean age 42.5 [SD 14.6] years) from the French NutriNet-Santé cohort (2009-2023). Dietary data were assessed using repeated 24-h dietary records, including industrial food brands. Cumulative time-dependent exposure to food additives was evaluated through multiple composition databases and ad hoc laboratory assays in food matrices. Associations between exposures to food coloring additives (sex-specific tertiles if proportion of exposed participants was more than two-thirds, or nonexposed/lower/higher exposed based on sex-specific median otherwise) and type 2 diabetes incidence were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsThere were 1,131 incident type 2 diabetes cases diagnosed (median follow-up, 8.05 years). After false discovery rate correction, intakes of the following colors were associated with higher type 2 diabetes incidence: total food coloring additives (hazard ratio [HR]higher vs. non/lower consumers 1.38 [95% CI 1.17-1.63], P = 0.0002), total caramel (1.43 [1.21-1.67], P = 0.0002), plain caramel (1.46 [1.26-1.70], P = 0.0002), sulfite ammonia caramel (1.30 [1.07-1.59], P = 0.007), total carotene (1.27 [1.08-1.48], P = 0.007), carotenoids (1.39 [1.19-1.62], P = 0.0002), β-carotene (1.44 [1.23-1.68], P = 0.0002), paprika-capsanthin-capsorubin (1.26 [1.08-1.46], P = 0.004), lutein (1.20 [1.02-1.40], P = 0.0002), curcumin (1.49 [1.29-1.73], P = 0.0002), cochineal-carminic acid-carmines (1.27 [1.10-1.48], P = 0.003), and anthocyanins (1.40 [1.17-1.68], P = 0.0002).
conclusionsSeveral positive associations were observed between exposure to natural and synthetic food coloring additives and type 2 diabetes incidence. Further studies are needed to gain insights into underlying mechanisms, and if confirmed, call for reevaluation of food coloring additives to protect consumer health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.