ArticleClinical epigenetics2026
Concordant epigenetic and discordant clinical PHP1B/iPPSD3 manifestations in two monozygotic adolescent twins.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImprinting disorders are caused by epigenetic alterations leading to abnormal gene expression from imprinted loci. Pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1B is characterized by methylation defects at the GNAS locus, affecting hormone responsiveness. Monozygotic twins discordant for imprinting disorders provide a unique opportunity to investigate the timing, maintenance, and tissue-specific distribution of epimutations and their relation to clinical expression. Most previous studies focus on infants, where fetal blood chimerism may influence epigenetic profiles, but data in adolescents remain scarce.
resultsWe studied adolescent monozygotic twin sisters presenting clinical and biochemical discordance for pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1B. Both twins exhibited an identical, partial methylation defect at the GNAS locus in peripheral blood, consistent with a postzygotic epigenetic alteration occurring before embryonic splitting. Exclusion of known genetic causes, including uniparental disomy and structural variants, and absence of multilocus imprinting disturbances or maternal-effect gene mutations, were confirmed through comprehensive genomic and methylation analyses. The affected twin showed involvement of methylation abnormalities across all three germ layers derived tissues, whereas the unaffected twin presented very mild or absent defects in some tissues, possibly explaining the phenotypic divergence. The persistent concordance of partial methylation defects in blood despite phenotypic discordance suggests stable early epimutations maintained in hematopoietic progenitors, while tissue-specific mosaicism and differential methylation maintenance across organs critical to disease expression contribute to clinical differences. Advanced long-read sequencing demonstrated sensitivity for detecting partial and mosaic methylation patterns, rather than just complete alterations.
conclusionsThis study underscores the complexity of epigenetic mosaicism in imprinting disorders, highlighting that early postzygotic partial epimutations may yield identical blood methylation profiles but divergent tissue distributions, leading to discordant clinical phenotypes in monozygotic twins. The adolescent age of our subjects challenges the fetal blood chimerism explanation for methylation concordance and emphasizes the importance of multi-tissue evaluation and sensitive molecular assays. These findings have important implications for diagnosis, monitoring, and genetic counseling in imprinting disorders, advocating for integrated approaches to assess epigenetic heterogeneity and phenotypic variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.