ArticleBMC psychology2026
The relationship between creative learning environment and adolescents' mathematical problem-solving ability: a moderated mediation model.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesMathematical problem-solving ability (MPSA), as a core indicator for measuring students' higher-order thinking development, is crucial for fostering the formation and transfer of their innovative capabilities. However, the complex mechanisms underlying MPSA require further exploration. The current study aims to deepen the understanding of the psychological mechanisms linking creative school and classroom environments (CSCE) to MPSA by examining the mediating effect of creative self-efficacy (CSE) and the moderating effect of ICT usage (ICTU). METHODOLOGY: Based on PISA 2022 and drawing on a sample of adolescents in Korea (N = 6,364), the current study employed descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and regression analysis, as well as constructed a moderated mediation model to systematically examine the complex mechanisms through which CSCE, CSE, and ICTU are associated with adolescents' MPSA.
resultsCSCE, CSE, and ICTU were all positively correlated with and significantly predicted MPSA. Further analysis revealed that CSCE was not only directly associated with MPSA, but also indirectly associated via CSE, which provides additional support for social cognitive theory. The moderating analysis further revealed that ICTU operated a dual role within the model. On the one hand, ICTU positively moderated the CSCE → CSE pathway, strengthening the positive association between the environment and self-efficacy. On the other hand, it negatively moderated both the CSCE → MPSA and CSE → MPSA pathways, suggesting that excessive ICTU may weaken the conversion of environmental and self-belief inputs into problem-solving capacity through increased cognitive load. Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed that the pattern of associations varies across different gender and mathematical literacy groups, specifically in terms of the direction and intensity of the mediation patterns and moderating effects, which differ according to group characteristics.
conclusionThe present study further preliminarily elucidates the complex psychological mechanisms through which creative learning environments are associated with mathematical problem-solving ability, provides empirical insights into the application of social cognitive and constructivist theories in high-pressure educational contexts, and offers guidance on implementing differentiated teaching interventions in the reducing academic burden and enhancing efficiency reforms in South Korea and similar educational systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.