Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42157326›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychology2026

Self-management behavior of children with cancer based on behavioral economics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abigail Aba Sanny, Lin Mo

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abigail Aba SannyDepartment of Nursing Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Children and Adolescents' Health and Diseases, Chongqing, China; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Child Neurodevelopment and Cognitive Disorders, Chongqing, China.
Lin MoOutpatient Department Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; National Clinical Research Center for Children and Adolescents' Health and Diseases, Chongqing, China; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Child Neurodevelopment and Cognitive Disorders, Chongqing, China. molin999@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in pediatric oncology have significantly improved survival rates among children with cancer. As survival increases, attention has shifted toward long-term health outcomes and quality of life, emphasizing the importance of effective self-management behaviors such as medication adherence, symptom monitoring, and lifestyle regulation. However, children's self-management behaviors are often constrained by developmental, cognitive, emotional, and contextual factors, limiting the effectiveness of traditional educational approaches.

objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes existing evidence on self-management interventions for children with cancer that are informed by behavioral economics principles and evaluates their effectiveness in improving self-management-related outcomes.

methodsThis review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251274173). We systematically searched multiple electronic databases. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental studies, cohort studies, and mixed-methods studies that reported original empirical data on behavioral economics-informed self-management interventions in pediatric oncology populations. Two reviewers independently assessed risk of bias using Cochrane tools. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis and evaluated heterogeneity using Cochran's Q test, τ

resultsA total of 30 studies (N ≈ 3,400 participants) were included, spanning 14 countries and employing behavioral economics strategies including nudging, framing, incentives, reminders, and choice architecture modifications. Behavioral economics-informed interventions were associated with a pooled standardized mean difference of SMD ≈ 0.55 (95% CI: 0.47-0.63; GRADE: MODERATE) for primary self-management outcomes, representing a moderate positive effect compared with usual care. A mean absolute percentage improvement of 20.2% (SD = 7.2; range: 10-40%) was observed across studies. Heterogeneity was moderate (I

conclusionThis review provides the first comprehensive synthesis at the intersection of pediatric oncology, self-management, and behavioral economics, demonstrating that self-management behaviors are shaped by the interaction of developmental stage, caregiver involvement, and healthcare context. Of the behavioral economics constructs examined, present bias mitigation through reminder systems and short-term incentives, loss-framing communication, and choice architecture simplification through defaults and structured routines emerged as the most consistently effective strategies. The findings inform the development of evidence-based, developmentally appropriate interventions to enhance self-management and long-term outcomes for children with cancer.

Indexed as

Economics, BehavioralNeoplasmsSelf-ManagementAdherence InterventionsChildHumansAdherenceBehavioral economicsMeta-analysisNudgingPediatric cancerSelf-managementSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42157326
PMCPMC13551766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.