ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2026
Uncovering unmet needs in healthcare teams: a cross-sectional study on the second victim phenomenon.
Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leadership and Organizational Responses After Patient Safety Incidents: A Systematic Review of Second-Victim Outcomes and Evidence Gaps in Safety Behaviors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare teams encounter adverse events and medical errors, and inadequate awareness and support can leave these teams vulnerable as "second victims" (SV). The objectives of our study were to assess healthcare professionals' understanding of the SV concept, evaluate the existing support systems in place, and identify the types of support mechanisms they consider most desirable.
methodsIn February 2024, the SV Experience and Support online survey was administered to healthcare workers in hospitals owned by Clalit Health Services, Israel. The survey focused on emotional responses following involvement in medical errors, perceived support from supervisors, and the availability of organizational resources. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software. A Likert scale was used, where 1 represented "strongly disagree" and 6 represented "strongly agree."
resultsThe survey was sent to 6,645 physicians and 11,855 nurses. A total of 483 physicians and 1,359 nurses participated in the survey (7.2% and 11.4% response rate, respectively). Both physicians and nurses reported high emotional stress (Mean scores: 4.89 ± 1.17 and 5.16 ± 1.06, respectively, p < 0.001) and embarrassment (Mean scores: 4.76 ± 1.16 and 4.94 ± 1.22, respectively, p < 0.001) following errors, with a notable desire for peer support (51.6%). Sleep disturbances also highlighted the adverse events' somatic burden and impact (Mean scores: 3.96 ± 1.49 and 4.22 ± 1.50, respectively, p = 0.002). The most desired support path was having a colleague to discuss the event (p < 0.001).
conclusionsHealthcare workers face a significant risk of becoming SV after unexpected medical events, and peer support is preferred. Program directors should therefore prioritize structured peer support initiatives, alongside robust formal systems and open communication, in accordance with workers' preferences. Addressing gaps in resource awareness and refining managerial approaches is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.