Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42157305›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2026

Cryoablation for early-stage invasive breast cancer: pathologic and imaging outcomes from the prospective FIRST trial.

Vanessa Monteiro Sanvido, Silvio Eduardo Bromberg, Angela Flávia Logullo Waitzberg, Jackeline Oliveira Gomes, Leticia Galvão Barbante, Luis Ricardo Socolowski, Bruna Mayumi Takaki Tachibana, Antonio Rahal Junior, Tamiris Abait Miranda, Karina do Lago Negrelli and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05398497 (Evaluation of Cryoablation in the Local Treatment of Early Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05398497 naunknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of Cryoablation in the Local Treatment of Early Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital do CoracaoRan2022 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsBreast Cancer, Breast NeoplasmsArmsCryoablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Vanessa Monteiro SanvidoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. vanessasanvido@gmail.com.
Silvio Eduardo BrombergHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Angela Flávia Logullo WaitzbergUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Jackeline Oliveira GomesHcor Research Institute, Desembargador Eliseu Guilherme, 200, 8th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 04004-030, Brazil.
Leticia Galvão BarbanteHcor Research Institute, Desembargador Eliseu Guilherme, 200, 8th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 04004-030, Brazil.
Luis Ricardo SocolowskiUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Bruna Mayumi Takaki TachibanaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Antonio Rahal JuniorHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tamiris Abait MirandaHcor Research Institute, Desembargador Eliseu Guilherme, 200, 8th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 04004-030, Brazil.
Karina do Lago NegrelliHcor Research Institute, Desembargador Eliseu Guilherme, 200, 8th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 04004-030, Brazil.
Eliana Vieira do Nascimento MartinsHcor Research Institute, Desembargador Eliseu Guilherme, 200, 8th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 04004-030, Brazil.
Renato Hideo Nakagawa SantosHcor Research Institute, Desembargador Eliseu Guilherme, 200, 8th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 04004-030, Brazil.
Paula Martinez ViannaCICAP-Pathology Laboratory, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leonard Medeiros da SilvaLocus-OC Precision Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alexandre Biasi CavalcantiHcor Research Institute, Desembargador Eliseu Guilherme, 200, 8th Floor, São Paulo, SP, 04004-030, Brazil.
Afonso Celso Pinto NazárioUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCryoablation is an emerging minimally invasive ablative technique for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer. The FIRST (FreezIng bReaST cancer in Brazil) trial was designed to evaluate the pathological efficacy and safety of cryoablation followed by surgery, to assess the accuracy of imaging modalities in predicting complete pathological response, and to explore technical predictors of successful tumor ablation.

methodsThis prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm phase II study enrolled adults with unifocal invasive breast cancer ≤ 2.5 cm, clearly visible on ultrasound and eligible for upfront surgery. All patients underwent ultrasound-guided cryoablation using a 2.4-mm cryoprobe, followed by standard surgical resection 14-28 days later. Complete ablation was defined as the absence of residual invasive or in situ carcinoma on final pathology. Secondary outcomes included imaging-pathology correlation and the association between tumor size, ice-ball dimensions, and ablation success.

resultsAmong 48 evaluable patients, the invasive complete ablation rate was 97.9%, with 100% success in tumors ≤ 2.0 cm on MRI. The complete ablation rate was 89.6%, increasing to 96.9% for tumors ≤ 2.0 cm and 100% for tumors ≤ 1.0 cm. Only one patient (2.1%) had residual invasive disease (3 mm). Residual ductal carcinoma in situ was observed in 12.5% of patients, with a mean size of 2.2 mm. Cryoablation was well tolerated, with one minor skin burn (2.1%) and no serious adverse events. MRI demonstrated high predictive accuracy for complete response (negative predictive value, 93.0%), whereas ultrasound and mammography were less accurate (negative predictive values, 9.3% and 34.9%, respectively). Ice-ball margins ≥ 1 cm beyond the tumor were associated with complete ablation in most cases.

conclusionsCryoablation achieved high rates of complete tumor ablation with an excellent safety profile, particularly in tumors ≤ 2.0 cm, in carefully selected patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer. These findings provide robust pathological and imaging validation of cryoablation as an effective ablative approach; however, they do not support its use as a standalone definitive therapy or, even when combined with adjuvant treatments such as radiotherapy and endocrine therapy, as a standard of care at this stage. As a phase II study, these results are not practice-changing and warrant confirmation in randomized phase III trials to evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes and to define the potential role of cryoablation within surgical de-escalation strategies.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05398497 (Registration date May 26, 2022).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCryosurgeryAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPathologic Complete ResponseProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBreast cancerCryoablationImage-guided ablationLocal therapyMinimally invasive treatment

Identifiers

PMID42157305
PMCPMC13359561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.