Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42157268›Full record

SynthesisMalaria journal2026

Community-level barriers and facilitators of indoor residual spraying for malaria control: a systematic review of qualitative evidence from sub-Saharan Africa.

Ivaan Pitua, Pascal Mathew Okorobe, Lorraine Apili, Ketra Venesa Nandera, Paghiel Grace Acoo, Kaweesi Calvin Nantalaga, Kiragga Denis Lwembawo, Kim Andrew Otto

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Malaria journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ivaan PituaSchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. ivaanpitua780@gmail.com.
Pascal Mathew OkorobeSchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Lorraine ApiliSchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Ketra Venesa NanderaSchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Paghiel Grace AcooSchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Kaweesi Calvin NantalagaSchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Kiragga Denis LwembawoSchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Kim Andrew OttoSchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIndoor residual spraying is a key strategy in the control against malaria, which still remains a devastating public health challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa. It was recommended by the World Health Organization, yet its effectiveness is still being compromised by low community uptake. Unlike other malaria interventions, indoor residual spraying is intrusive and requires entry into private household spaces and substantial domestic preparation. Household refusal and locked structures still remain primary threats to the success of the campaign. Although qualitative studies have examined community perceptions of indoor residual spraying, their findings remain dispersed and have not been systematically synthesised.

methodsA systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis was conducted following the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research guidelines. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL) were searched for peer-reviewed qualitative studies published between 2010 and May 2024. Studies were selected using the Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, and Research Type framework and appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist. Thematic synthesis was undertaken through line-by-line coding and the development of descriptive themes.

resultsThe systematic search yielded 321 records. Ten studies from seven Sub-Saharan African countries met the full inclusion criteria. Eight major analytical themes emerged: (1) operational and household burdens, particularly the labor required to prepare homes; (2) perceived efficacy and cognitive factors, including concerns about bedbugs and visible insect control; (3) socio-political dynamics and trust in authorities; (4) programmatic communication and sprayer conduct; (5) gender dynamics in household decision-making; (6) structural and seasonal incompatibility; (7) implementation strategy and spatial equity; and (8) endorsement systems and local health infrastructure.

conclusionCommunity engagement with indoor residual spraying is shaped by complex social, gendered, and political factors involving labor, gender, and privacy rights. Coverage requires a shift toward human-centered implementation approaches that reduce household labor burdens, address concerns about nuisance insects, ensure respectful sprayer conduct, and strengthen community trust. Integrating these considerations into indoor residual spraying programs is essential for sustaining effective malaria control in Sub-Saharan Africa. PROSPERO Registration number: CRD420251248457.

Indexed as

InsecticidesMalariaMosquito ControlAfrica South of the SaharaHumansInsecticidesBarriersCommunity engagementFacilitatorsIndoor residual sprayingMalariaQualitative evidenceSub-Sahara Africa

Identifiers

PMID42157268
PMCPMC13360206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.