Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42157252›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2026

Comparative evaluation of multiplex bead assay, polymerase chain reaction, and rapid diagnostic test for P. falciparum detection in community surveys in Malawi.

Monica Soko, Victoria Seffren, Tinashe A Tizifa, Dean Sayre, Laura C Steinhardt, Laura Castro, Pius Masache, David Twapokera Mzinza, Fraction Kunseu Dzinjalamala, Kamija S Phiri and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Monica Soko *Blantyre Malaria Project, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi. sokomonica2012@gmail.com.
Victoria Seffren *Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Tinashe A TizifaTraining and Research Unit of Excellence (TRUE), Blantyre, Malawi.
Dean SayreMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Laura C SteinhardtMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Laura CastroMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Pius MasacheU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, USAID, Lilongwe, Malawi.
David Twapokera MzinzaBlantyre Malaria Project, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Fraction Kunseu DzinjalamalaCenter for Clinical and Biological Sciences Research (CCBSR), Academy of Medical Sciences, Malawi University of Science and Technology, Thyolo, Malawi.
Kamija S PhiriTraining and Research Unit of Excellence (TRUE), Blantyre, Malawi.
Karl B SeydelBlantyre Malaria Project, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Julie R GutmanMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Jessica McCafferyLaboratory Science and Diagnostics Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA. jessica.mccaffery@emory.edu.

Funding

NIH Grant 1U19AI189683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate detection of malaria infections, particularly asymptomatic and low-density infections, is essential for effective surveillance and control efforts. This study compared the performance of three malaria detection platforms for identifying Plasmodium falciparum infections in a community-based survey setting.

methodsCross-sectional household surveys were conducted in three high-transmission districts in Malawi from February-March in 2022 and 2023. From 2960 participants, samples from 604 children aged 2 months to 14 years were analyzed for P. falciparum infection using three detection methods: WHO-prequalified HRP2-based rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), a multiplex bead-based assay (MBA) for histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2) and Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) antigens, and a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting P. falciparum 18S rRNA, which was considered the gold standard test.

resultsPCR detected a P. falciparum prevalence of 24.0% (145/604; 95% CI 20.7-27.6%) compared to 29.5% by RDT (178/604; 95% CI 25.9-33.3%). RDT performance was suboptimal compared to PCR, with RDT sensitivity of 48.3% (95% CI 39.9-56.7%) and specificity of 76.5% (95% CI 72.3-80.3%). Seventy-five PCR-positive samples were RDT-negative, possibly representing low-density infections below RDT detection limits, while 108 RDT-positive samples were PCR-negative, consistent with persistent HRP2 antigenemia following parasite clearance. Receiver operating curve analyses demonstrated that the MBA for both antigens showed limited discriminatory power against PCR, HRP2 (AUC = 0.63, 95% CI 0.58-0.69) and pLDH (AUC = 0.61, 95% CI 0.56-0.67). However, MBA demonstrated strong agreement with RDTs, (HRP2: AUC = 0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.96); pLDH: AUC = 0.88, (95% CI 0.85-0.92), indicating comparable antigen detection capabilities. PCR was estimated to be 41.3% less expensive in start-up costs and 32.2% less in processing costs compared to the MBA.

conclusionsIn high-transmission, community-based settings, the malaria antigen detection MBA demonstrated a limited ability to detect P. falciparum infections when compared to infection identified by PCR. Real-time PCR is increasingly feasible for use in surveillance where infrastructure permits. These findings underscore the importance of selecting diagnostic tools based on surveillance objectives, local epidemiology, and available laboratory capacity.

Indexed as

Malaria, FalciparumPlasmodium falciparumPolymerase Chain ReactionRapid Diagnostic TestsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAdolescentAntigens, ProtozoanChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMalawiMaleSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, ProtozoanMalariaMultiplex bead assayP. falciparumRapid diagnostic testsReal-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID42157252
PMCPMC13360041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.